Skip to main content

Latest Sample Band 8 Essay Task 2 FOR YOU!

www.millenniumcareer.com 

Some people think that it is good for a country’s culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Others think that it is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

People have different views about whether it is better for a country to purchase foreign movies or to create domestic ones. While importing movies from other countries can have some advantages, I would argue that producing local movies is a much better option.
On the one hand, there are some clear benefits of buying movies from other countries. Firstly, when a country imports movies that are produced overseas, it can help its people learn about other cultures in a much easier and more effective way. This would help its citizens to be more knowledgeable. Secondly, individuals can learn the good things of other more civilised societies and alter the way they behave. For example, the habit of queuing is a nice thing in many Western countries, and people from Vietnam can learn and copy this action when watching foreign movies.
On the other hand, I believe it is better for countries to produce movies domestically because of some reasons. The first one is that movies made by local people would help to preserve the traditions and customs of their own cultures. For instance, many Vietnamese TV programmes remind young generations of how people celebrate Lunar New Year, which is the most important public holiday in some Asian countries. If young people only watch foreign movies, the traditional values might be gradually forgotten. Another reason is that the film industry often create jobs such as actors, directors or cameramen. Therefore, it is necessary to invest in producing movies in order to provide more employment opportunities for local people.
In conclusion, while purchasing foreign movies is beneficial for a nation’s culture to some extent, it seems to me that making local ones is a much better choice.
Sample 2
For the past decades, the importance of a country developing its own motion picture expertise versus importing foreign entertainment programs has been the center of attention in the entertainment industry. I believe that having the best of both worlds would work most effectively.
There are certain grounds supporting the view of featuring foreign films and TV shows. Firstly, globalization supports the widespread of cultural products that integrate within themselves the essence of the nation from which they originates. Viewers, therefore, while enjoying the entertaining element of these programs can simultaneously learn more about the world and its various cultures. For instance, an Asian viewer can be amazed by the individualism conveyed in western blockbuster movies while an American can explore the significance of collective eastern values from a Chinese or Korean drama. Furthermore, the international trade of these items has not only aided the development of globalized culture but also broadened people’s understanding of the diverse world around them. It is not deemed daring to say that without cultural exchange through TV channels, feeling and learning about other cultures would turn less visually impressive.
On the other hand, it is justifiable, though maybe considered ethnocentric, that domestic entertainment products retain an equally indispensable role in a country’s film segments. The most obvious reason is that the act of a country developing its own movies and broadcasting industry is of necessity to preserve its culture. Through local films and TV shows, children and adolescents develop their cognition of local customs and traditional values and have a tendency to practice them. Another endorsing reason is that domestic films and shows are irreplaceable products that bring people true feelings and complete understanding of contexts and clichés used. Since people can more easily relate themselves to others who speak their language and whose behavior they could totally understand, viewers can reflect themselves and their society in a lively way through local TV programs.
In conclusion, I believe it is crucial for a country to find a balanced coexistence of both ways, not only advancing towards globalization but also preserving one’s unique film and TV industry.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ESSAY #154 || IELTS WRITING TASK 2 || SOLVED ESSAY || DISCUSS BOTH VIEW TYPE ESSAY || BOOK 17 TEST 3 STATEMENT || 27 DECEMBER 2022 || ONLINE IELTS CLASSES ||

ESSAY:: Some people believe that professionals like doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. others believe that they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both views and give your opinion.  SAMPLE ANSWER:: A section of society thinks that professionals such as physicians and engineers should work in their native country where they graduated while the other section opines that such professionals are independent to choose where to work in the world. This essay will discuss both the viewpoints along with my personal thought.  Why the first opinion is justified because a country invests a lot of resources in order to build a professional especially a doctor or engineer. Such as, to educate a student with an engineering degree, a nation spends heavily on the faculty, infrastructure, labs, curriculum, job assistance and other aspects then only a student gets the degree. For example, in an IIT, to provi...

IELTS WRITING TASK 2 || ESSAY || SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT ALLOWING CHILDREN TO MAKE THEIR OWN CHOICES ON EVERYDAY MATTERS SUCH A FRUIT COURSE CLOTHES AND ENTERTAINMENT IS LIKELY TO RESULT IN SOCIETY OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ONLY THING ABOUT THEIR OWN WISHES OTHER PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT IT IS IMPORTANT FOR CHILDREN TO MAKE DECISIONS ABOUT THE ABOUT MATTERS THAT AFFECT THEM? DISCUSS BOTH THESE VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OPINION || MARCH 2021

INTRODUCTION A PORTION OF SOCIETY OF  OPINE THAT LETTING CHILDREN TO TAKE THEIR  PERSONAL DECISIONS REGARDING DAY TO DAY SUBJECTS; FOR EXAMPLE FOOD, APPARELS AND RECREATIONAL GENERALLY CREATES A COMMUNITY WHO ONLY THINKS IN SELFISH TERMS SINCE THEY ARE THOUGHT THEY ARE TAUGHT TO IGNORE OTHER PEOPLE'S COMFORT AND THINKING, WHILE OTHER SECTION OF PEOPLE CONSIDER THAT IT IS VITAL FOR KIDS TO MAKE DECISIONS ABOUT THINGS THAT ARE RELATED TO THEM BECAUSE IT WILL INSTALL A CONSIDERABLE CONFIDENCE IN THEM EVENTUALLY I WILL SHARE MY OPINION AS WELL. BODY PARAGRAPH 1 BY GIVING PERMISSION TO CHILDREN TO FOLLOW THEIR TASTE CALLINGS AND WISHES LET THEM TO BE SELF OBSESSED SINCE THEIR NEWEST SINCE THEY NEGLECT ABOUT PEOPLE PEOPLE WHO ARE AROUND WHAT THEY THINK? WHAT THEY LIKE? WHAT DO THEY CONSIDER COMFORTABLE? SUCH AS, A RESOURCE IT MADE UP OF CHILDREN BASED ON BUYING AND USING THINGS THAT ONLY FULFILS THEM WITHOUT FOCUSING A CARRIER BENEFIT IS THE CONSEQUENCE OF SUCH PARADIGM. FOR EXAMPLE...

ESSAY # 173 || JANUARY 28, 2025 || DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OPINION TYPE OF ESSAY || 7.5 BANDS ANSWER || CONTACT FOR IELTS GT OR AC ONLINE CLASSES 91-9996605415 ||

  Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both views and give your opinion. A section of the society opines that in contemporary era, individuals can watch movies on their cellphones or tablets which makes it useless to visit to theatre or cinema hall to watch the same movie, while, rest of the people believe that in order to savor a movie, one must go to cinema. This essay will discuss both of the viewpoints along with my personal approach. First opinion is justified since mobile phone revolution has brought many opportunities to its users, out of them, watching a movie at your own, at your preferred location, at your convenience is one major advancement. For example, last week I saw a Bollywood movie on Netflix which was few weeks ago in the cinemas all over India, I saw it as per my convenience with much less investment of money and e...