Skip to main content

Latest Sample Band 8 Essay Task 2 FOR YOU!

www.millenniumcareer.com 

Some people think that it is good for a country’s culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Others think that it is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

People have different views about whether it is better for a country to purchase foreign movies or to create domestic ones. While importing movies from other countries can have some advantages, I would argue that producing local movies is a much better option.
On the one hand, there are some clear benefits of buying movies from other countries. Firstly, when a country imports movies that are produced overseas, it can help its people learn about other cultures in a much easier and more effective way. This would help its citizens to be more knowledgeable. Secondly, individuals can learn the good things of other more civilised societies and alter the way they behave. For example, the habit of queuing is a nice thing in many Western countries, and people from Vietnam can learn and copy this action when watching foreign movies.
On the other hand, I believe it is better for countries to produce movies domestically because of some reasons. The first one is that movies made by local people would help to preserve the traditions and customs of their own cultures. For instance, many Vietnamese TV programmes remind young generations of how people celebrate Lunar New Year, which is the most important public holiday in some Asian countries. If young people only watch foreign movies, the traditional values might be gradually forgotten. Another reason is that the film industry often create jobs such as actors, directors or cameramen. Therefore, it is necessary to invest in producing movies in order to provide more employment opportunities for local people.
In conclusion, while purchasing foreign movies is beneficial for a nation’s culture to some extent, it seems to me that making local ones is a much better choice.
Sample 2
For the past decades, the importance of a country developing its own motion picture expertise versus importing foreign entertainment programs has been the center of attention in the entertainment industry. I believe that having the best of both worlds would work most effectively.
There are certain grounds supporting the view of featuring foreign films and TV shows. Firstly, globalization supports the widespread of cultural products that integrate within themselves the essence of the nation from which they originates. Viewers, therefore, while enjoying the entertaining element of these programs can simultaneously learn more about the world and its various cultures. For instance, an Asian viewer can be amazed by the individualism conveyed in western blockbuster movies while an American can explore the significance of collective eastern values from a Chinese or Korean drama. Furthermore, the international trade of these items has not only aided the development of globalized culture but also broadened people’s understanding of the diverse world around them. It is not deemed daring to say that without cultural exchange through TV channels, feeling and learning about other cultures would turn less visually impressive.
On the other hand, it is justifiable, though maybe considered ethnocentric, that domestic entertainment products retain an equally indispensable role in a country’s film segments. The most obvious reason is that the act of a country developing its own movies and broadcasting industry is of necessity to preserve its culture. Through local films and TV shows, children and adolescents develop their cognition of local customs and traditional values and have a tendency to practice them. Another endorsing reason is that domestic films and shows are irreplaceable products that bring people true feelings and complete understanding of contexts and clichés used. Since people can more easily relate themselves to others who speak their language and whose behavior they could totally understand, viewers can reflect themselves and their society in a lively way through local TV programs.
In conclusion, I believe it is crucial for a country to find a balanced coexistence of both ways, not only advancing towards globalization but also preserving one’s unique film and TV industry.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

IELTS PART 3 || QUESTIONS ON FAMOUS PEOPLE || BEST POSSIBLE ANSWERS || IELTSDK GLOBAL

Welcome IELTS aspirants all over the world. Thank you so much for the love and support that you have been giving unconditionally to our work and team members. We always try our best to create the most relevant and effective IELTS content... THERE ARE SOME FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS ON THE TOPIC OF CELEBRITIES LIKE A FAMOUS PERSON YOU ARE INTERESTED IN, THERE ARE 6 QUESTIONS. 1. WHAT KINDS OF CELEBRITIES ARE THERE IN YOUR COUNTRY? IN MY COUNTRY PEOPLE FROM BUSINESS, PEOPLE FROM SPORTS, PEOPLE FROM BOLLYWOOD, POLITICS AND SOME SOCIAL ACTIVISTS ARE FAMOUS. ALSO, SUCH PEOPLE ARE TREATED AS CELEBRITIES IN MY COUNTRY BECAUSE THEY HAVE INFLUENCE, THEY HAVE IMPACT, THEY TOUCH MILLIONS OF PEOPLE THROUGH THEIR WORDS THROUGH THEIR ACTIONS AND THROUGH THEIR BEHAVIOUR. SUCH PEOPLE ARE TREATED AS CELEBRITIES IN MY COUNTRY INDIA. 2. WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN FAMOUS PEOPLE TODAY AND THOSE IN THE PAST? YES, THERE IS A CLEAR DISTINCTION BETWEEN FAMOUS PEOPLE OF THE PAST AND FAMOUS PEOPLE TODAY BECAUSE F...

|| IELTS WRITING TASK 2 || ESSAY || APRIL 2021 || SOLVED ESSAY NO - 76 ||

Space exploration costs taxpayers an exorbitant amount of money each year. What are the advantages and disadvantages of spending money on space exploration? INTRODUCTION A humongous quota of wonga of taxpayers’ money is used on space research throughout the year by the public as well as private organizations. This essay will discuss its two chief merits as tremendously vital knowledge about other planets and feasibility to survive on them, whereas, its two leading drawbacks are deleterious pollution caused by the waste besides hazard to human life. BODY PARAGRAPH - 1 What are its two salient benefits? First is, it bestows fruitful and worthwhile command about other planets. For instance, I got to know about the earth’s natural satellite Moon while I was in my 8th standard that there is no environment and water to sustain any form of life. Thus, it is crucial to be well prepared and equipped with the most advanced technologies to explore the Moon. The second is, huge sums of money are b...

Do you think it is a positive or negative development? BAND 7 SAMPLE ANSWER IELTS 2019

Essay Fully Solved: Scientists predict that all people will talk the same global language in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? Best Solution: Language can be a catalyst in progress if it connects people of different profiles while it can be a deterrent if it emanates barriers among individuals. The forecasting of scientific people presents the opinion that future will witness one language worldwide as a mode of interaction. According to me, it is a positive development since it gives birth to a barrier-Free communication as well as with singular language across world, every nation will be on same platform to convey their strengths. First positive aspect of having one language among all nations will be, mutual understanding will be increased because no differences in modes of communication. For example, businesses among nations will flourish, no more the availability of various languages will hamper the overall comprehension of the message, it will ...